Contact us
Eurofinanzza Services
Who we are
Offshore Introduction
Incorporating Offshore
Why Going Offshore
Why and when should I use Offshore
How to select an Offshore Jurisdiction
Structure of an Offshore Company
The Offshore for US Citizens
Going Offshore - Quick Answers
Offshore Applications
Tax Planning – UK Citizens Working Abroad
Offshore Tax Planning Solutions - Musicians
Asset Protection
Estate Planning
Panama as a Banking Centre
The Best Banking Centers in the World
Overseas Jurisdictions
General information
Australia - Company Formation
Australia – Register a Branch of Foreign Corporation
Australia Company Formation - Incorporation Fees
Australia – Foreign Investment Regulation
Australia - Banking System
Australia – Financial Services Licensing Regime
Incorporating in Belize
Advantages to incorporate in Belize
Belize IBC Incorporation Fees
Setting up a Trust in Belize
Trust in Belize - Incorporation Fees
Mutual Funds in Belize - Incorporation and Fees
Bank Formation in Belize
International Insurance Licenses in Belize - Incorporation Fees
British Virgin Islands
Incorporating in BVI
BVI - Guarantee Company Formation
BVI - Offshore Mutual Funds
BVI - Incorporation Fees
BVI - License Fees
Canada incorporation - Introduction
Canada - For non Profit Corporations
Canada - Taxation
Canada - Incorporating in British Columbia
Canada - Incorporating in Nova Scotia
Canada - Real Estate Use of Offshore Companies
Canada - Offshore for Canadian Citizens
Canada - Incorporation Fees
Cayman Islands
Cayman Islands - Tax Exempted Company - Compliance Information
Cayman Islands - Incorporation Fees
China Business Services Overview
Doing Business in China - Forms of Entities
China - Representitive Office
Advantages of Hong Kong Holding Structure
China JV and WOFE Memorandum
Cook Islands
Cook Islands - General Features
Cook Island - Compliance and General information
Cook Islands - Wealth Protection Law
Cook Islands - Private Trustee Companies
Cook Islands - Trust Incorporation
Cook Islands
Cook Islands - Trustee Company - Incorporation Fees
Cook islands - Anonymous Confidential Tax Planning Asset Protections Structures
Cook Islands - Anonymous Confidential Structures
Cook Islands - Trustee Company - Incorporation Fees
Costa Rica
Costa Rica - Compliance Information
Costa Rica Double Taxation Treaties
Costa Rica -E-Gambling Corporation
Costa Rica - Incorporation Fees
Incorporating in Gibraltar
Gibraltar - Tax Exempt vs. Non-Resident Companies
Gribraltar - E-commerce
Gibraltar Incorporation Fees
Trust in Gibraltar
Trust Formation in Gibraltar – Incorporation Fees
Hong Kong
Incorporating in Hong kong
Hong Kong Company Requirements & Formation Procedures
HK Non Profit Organization Charitable Institution
Hong Kong - Double Taxation Treaties
Hong Kong Taxation
Hong Kong – Double Taxation Agreement with Mainland China
Hong Kong Incorporation Fees
Opening Corporate Bank Account in Hong Kong
History of India - Overview
Investing in India - Country Incentives and Policy
Company Formation in India - Compliance Information
Taxation System in India
Company Formation in India - Incorporation Fees
Registration of Licensed Online Pharmacy
Isle of Man
Incorporating in Isle of Man - Limited Liability Company
Incorporating in Isle of Man LLC - Incorporation Fees
Jersey Offshore Company incorporation
Trust formation in Jersey
Trust Formation in Jersey Islands – Incorporation Fees
Incorporating in Jersey – Tax Exempted Company – Incorporation Fees
Madeira Islands
Madeira Offshore - an International Business Centre
Incorporating in Madeira Islands
Taxation and Tax Treaties
Madeira - Incorporation Fees
Madeira - Links and Downloads
Mauritius Offshore Incorporation
Mauritius GBCII – Incorporation Fees
Nevis - Company Formation
Nevis - Corporate Structures
Nevis - Limited Liability Company
Nevis - Trust Formation
Nevis - Offshore Bank Formation
Nevis LLC – Limited Liability Company – Incorporation Fees
New Zealand
New Zealand - Jurisdiction Information
New Zealand Look-Through Companies (LTC)
New Zealand - Company Statutory Information
New Zealand - Company Limited by Shares - Incorporation fees
New Zealand Foreign Trust - Overview
New Zealand - Incorporation of Foreign Trust
New Zealand Foreign Trusts - Incorporation Fees
How to Incorporate your New Zealand Asset Protection Structure
New Zealand Financial Services Company
New Zealand Finance Companies – FSP Licensed - Registration Fees
Offshore Banking Software for Financial Institutions
Links, Resources, International Compliance and Banking Regulations
Panamanian IBC
Panamanian IBC - Incorporation Fees
Trusts & Foundations - General Overview
Panamanian Trusts
Panamanian Trusts - Incorporation Fees
Panamanian Private Interest Foundations
Panama – Private Interest Foundation – Incorporation Fees
Panamanian Financial Corporations - Formation and Fees
Panama – Mutual Funds and Investment Corporations
Panama - Offshore E-commerce Solutions - Services and Fees
Incorporating in Seychelles
Incorporating an IBC in Seychelles – Incorporation Fees
St. Vincent & Grenadines
St. Vincent & the Grenadines – Jurisdiction Information
Advantages to incorporate in St. Vincent & the Grenadines
St. Vincent & the Grenadines – IBC Incorporation
St. Vincent & the Grenadines – Trust Formation
St. Vincent & the Grenadines – Mutual Funds
St. Vincent & the Grenadines – Offshore Bank Formation
St. Vincent & the Grenadines – Insurance Companies
St. Vincent & the Grenadines – Legal and Taxation Regime
St. Vincent & the Grenadines – IBC Incorporation Fees
Turks & Caicos
Incorporating in Turks & Caicos
Turks & Caicos – IBC Formation – Incorporation Fees
United Arab Emirates (UAE)
Incorporating in Dubai
Advantages to Incorporate in Dubai
Company Formation in Dubai
Incorporating in Dubai - Incorporation Fees
United States of America
Incorporating in US - C vs S Corporations
Forming a “C” Corporation in USA Delaware - Fees
US LLC - Limited Liability Company - Tax Advantages
The State of California
The State of Delaware
Advantages to incorporate in Delaware
The State of Florida
The State of Nevada
The State of New York
The State of Oregon
US LLC - Incorporation Compliance
US LLC – Limited Liability Company – Incorporation Fees
Delaware Series LLC - Fractional Ownership Purposes
Delaware Series LLC - Fractional Ownership Purposes - Incorporation Fees
US - incorporation States
US Foundations - Non profit Corporations
US Foundations – Non Profit Corporations - Articles
US Foundations – Non Profit Corporations – By-Laws
US Corporation Annual Fees
Uruguay - Incorporation Features
Investing in Uruguay
Uruguay SAFI and SA Company Formation - Incorporation Fees






When discussing the services that Eurofinanzza provides we often get non-lawyers asking about the legitimacy of using trusts to protect wealth. Many people also ask whether Cook Islands laws are overly aggressive in protecting trust funds. In reality however trusts have been used for hundreds of years for the same purposes- protecting personal and family wealth so that it can be used in times of need, and by future generations.

Cook Islands law is based on the old English law principles, and the International Trusts Act, while certainly modifying those principles and bringing the balance more in favour of the trust, responds to what we perceive as excessive extensions of personal liability in some jurisdictions, including the United States.

In this section we present a current status of Cook Islands wealth protection law.

The legal history behind the implementation of the International Trusts Act, some of the modern mischief's that such legislation is designed to address, and some of the factors in selecting an offshore jurisdiction.

This should provide some more insight for those who question the use of trusts as an asset protection planning tool.

Recent changes to the International Companies Act. While these are relatively minor, they should be the first of a raft of improvements and updates to the Cook Islands offshore legislation over the coming years. As an example we expect to see new LLC legislation and insurance legislation early in 2007, both of which should help to expand the services that can be provided from the Cook Islands, and give an excellent alternative to the established LLC and insurance jurisdictions.



What tools were traditionally available to protect a family's wealth from financial misadventure?

Although trust law developed initially around family and land tenure, by the 16th century there was already use of family trusts for wealth protection. However there was always some balance in the use of trusts for wealth protection because of the threat of debtors' prison. This meant there was always a strong interest in funds being available for payment to creditors, whether the wealth was held in trusts or otherwise. At a very early stage the timing of the funding of trusts also become important due to the development of fraudulent transfer law based on tort of deceit and criminal fraud. Both required proof of intent to defraud beyond reasonable doubt.

In 1541, the Statute of Elizabeth redefined the common law elements of fraud introducing a new remedy for fraudulent transfer. The consequence of fraud and fraudulent transfer was to avoid the transfer, making the assets available to creditors. Parts of the Statute of Elizabeth still survive in one form or another in the legislation in many jurisdictions, including most states of the United States. The limitation of fraudulent transfer actions is therefore a key consideration in the choice of a trust jurisdiction.

Limited Liability Companies were created by statute in the 1800s. The company structure limited the liability of the investor to the share capital subscribed for. it effectively quarantined personal wealth from commercial investments. Also in the late 1800s, the first bankruptcy law enacted with three key aspects:

a) A bankrupt person essentially received a "get out of jail free" card. Wealth could now be held in a trust without fear of debtor’s prison;

b) Certain assets were exempt from bankruptcy; and

c) Claw back powers were introduced for prior transactions, now the remedy of avoidance for fraudulent transfer and fraud was available for all transfers taking place within a time period without having to prove intent to defraud or satisfy criminal burdens of proof.

The first limitation statutes were introduced in the late 19th century. The issue here was how long should a person's errors continue to haunt him? The common law doctrine of 'laches' gave some protection by requiring a plaintiff to act on his rights within a reasonable time or lose these rights.

The limitation statutes set arbitrary but finite time limits within which a plaintiff could bring an action, thus bringing some degree of certainly in this area.

Dealing with the Mischief in the 20th century
The 20th century brought a number of new problems. Most significant in the United States was the increased exposure of wealth due to an explosion of doctrines of personal liability as well as significantly increased damages awards.

The phenomena of the trial lawyer and the practice of contingency fees were important contributors to this. The United States is probably the most litigious country in the world with the most extreme personal liability exposure of any country.

Although corporations and limited liability companies still provide shareholders with an effective quarantine of their personal wealth form the failure of the business, the directors of such companies are increasingly exposed personally. Directors liabilities are both civil and criminal, and prison terms post Enron remind us of the debtor’s prisons of the 1800s.

In the United States new bankruptcy legislation has extended claw back periods, as well as restricting some of the exemptions, some of which were viewed as generous. In a similar approach, Australia has recently enacted a 10 year claw back rule.

The protection offered by limitation statutes has in practice become circumscribed due to courts consistently requiring knowledge of a right of action before time begins to run.

Courts have continued to explore new methods of setting aside trusts and transfers to trusts. There has been development of badges of fraud where fraud is presumed and the burden passes to the defendant. There are concepts of future fraud dealing with transfers to trusts before any cause of caution existed. Doctrines of incomplete transfer have also developed to account for the situation where control or benefit is retained by the Settlor. In the United States the courts further developed the self settled trust doctrine. This doctrine is unique to US, law clients turning to a foreign jurisdiction to establish a family trust.

Simply Establish an Offshore Trust
A Watertight Solution?

Historically, offshore wealth protection meant hiding your assets offshore. It didn't really matter what the laws of the offshore jurisdiction said about foreign judgments, as long as they provided for confidentiality. If the existence of a trust was discovered, in theory the trust could be moved immediately to another offshore jurisdiction, the creditor being left to trace it and issue proceedings in the new jurisdiction. While there was and still is a place for confidentiality, this response is now very definitely out of date. A trustee participating in such an exercise nowadays is likely to find itself being cited as a party to a conspiracy to defraud. Further-more, recent anti money laundering legislation makes planning based on hiding assets even more precarious.

Ordinary principles of international law recognized by English law jurisdictions make it a relatively simple process in many jurisdictions to enforce a foreign judgement dealing with a sum of money.

The same objective may be accomplished under a wide range of constitutional legislation, and there are several treaties, both multilateral and bi-lateral, simplifying recognition and enforcement of foreign judgements. Simply put if a U.S. court finds that a transfer to a foreign trust is a fraudulent transfer and therefore void, it will issue an order to the foreign trustee to transfer the assets back to the transferor, or his creditors. In many offshore jurisdictions touting themselves as suitable for asset protection, such a decision is going to be recognized and given effect by the foreign court against the foreign trustee.

As mentioned above, the Statue of Elizabeth, or derivations of it, still applies in many countries and provides a mechanism to unwind transfers to a trust made with the intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors. If the chosen jurisdiction does not provide sensible limits to the ability of a creditor to establish a fraudulent transfer then little practical protection is obtained.

As can be seen it is not sufficient for a U.S. person to take advantage of foreign law simply by establishing a trust in a foreign jurisdiction. It is important to identify a jurisdiction which will not give ready recognition or effect to a U.S. decision contrary to local law and which limits the ability of a creditor to challenge transfers to a trust established in such a jurisdiction. It was against this background that the Cook Islands entered the wealth protection arena in 1988.

Cook Islands legal system and the special features of the Cook Islands International Trusts Act 1984.


Two recent amendments to the legislation have enhanced the suitability and competitiveness of using a Cook Islands International Company as a holding or investment entity. The removal of the requirement to issue share certificates and the de-regulation of fee levels have been welcomed by both trust companies and their clients.

The International Companies Act 1981-82 allows companies to be formed and operated with both flexibility and administrative ease making them an ideal asset holding entity or a commercial trading vehicle. Some of the advantages include: tax exempt in the Cook Islands, strict confidentiality provisions, no public record of shareholders or directors, accounts are not required to be filed, shares can take advantage of specific asset protection provisions, and a company can act as a trustee of a Cook Islands International Trust.

Confidentiality and flexibility have now been further enhanced by the removal of the requirement to issue share certificates. Previously share certificates were necessary to cat as evidence of legal title to issued shares. Pursuant to the International Companies Amendment Act 2006 legal title of shares is now evidenced by the Members Register which is kept at the registered office of the company in the Cook Islands. Instead of issuing share certificates, the name and details of each shareholder is recorded by the company on the Members Register. Access to the register is at the discretion of the directors of the company.

As a result of the aforementioned amendment we will no longer issue share certificates unless specifically requested to do so. If existing shareholders wish to relinquish their physical share certificates and simply have their details recorded in the register of members then they are welcome to do so. As well as increased privacy, the removal of share certificates eases the administrative procedures for registering and transferring share ownership.

If evidence of ownership is needed for practical purposes such as opening bank accounts then the company secretary can provide the shareholder with a certified copy of the Members Register.

In May 2006 the Cook Islands government agreed with industry proposals to reduce government registration fees for International Companies. This is partly as a result of the increasing number of international shipping companies being registered and is also due to the Cook Islands desire to continue to compete strongly in the ever growing offshore corporate services market. As a result the incorporation and renewal fee charged by the Registrar has been slightly lowered. Furthermore the previous minimum level of fees to be charged by trustee companies has been removed.

These changes should result in greater competition within other the Cook Islands, but more importantly with other offshore jurisdictions.

For clients it means that the Cook Islands remain a viable and appropriate alternative to the traditional offshore corporate providers.





European Jurisdictions
Czech Republic
The Netherlands
Republic of Ireland
United kingdom
Shelf and Aged Companies
Nominee Structures
Virtual Offices
Offshore Banking
Offshore e-Commerce
Website Design
Relative Services
Currency converter
Contact us